KMX 125 engine re-build.

Twangled your powervalve grommit in your woodruff key? ask someone how to fix it here
User avatar
JanBros
Avgas Sniffer
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: the land of Francorchamps
Contact:

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by JanBros » Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:00 pm

stevo135+ wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:25 pm
just bore it out the 0.6mm that I need to match the bore. I think that would work.
how much is 55.3 + 0.6 ?
and how much is your bore ?

I don't think it will work ...
My ultimate goal is to die young as late as possible !

stevo135+
Light Smoker
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by stevo135+ » Wed Nov 06, 2019 1:23 am

Hi. The piston size is 55.94mm, so I presumed that the head gasket ideally wants to be just a fraction bigger than the bore size. Wouldn't 56mm exactly be OK?

I was thinking that boring it out by such a small amount won't effect the fire ring area of the gasket and so I can't see why it couldn't be a reliable solution?

If it proves not to be a good solution then I still have the option of getting a good engineering shop or tuner to machine a series of O-ring grooves into the head, though I'd lose 0.25mm of my squish clearance then unless I lift the cylinder with a thicker base gasket.

Or maybe I can find a company that can make me a custom head gasket that's a bit bigger using the original one as a pattern. I'm keen to get this sorted out one way or another, but in an ideal world I won't have to remove the cylinder or raise it, as I'm worried doing that could mean my exhaust won't work as well as it should then.

User avatar
500bernie
Avgas Sniffer
Posts: 3300
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Teesside

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by 500bernie » Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:58 am

Just scribe it against the barrel and carefully take off the excess with a dremel it's not difficult (just messy, wear gloves and goggles).
Firecracker Red and Grey C3 300

User avatar
JanBros
Avgas Sniffer
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: the land of Francorchamps
Contact:

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by JanBros » Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:09 pm

stevo135+ wrote:
Wed Nov 06, 2019 1:23 am
Hi. The piston size is 55.94mm, so I presumed that the head gasket ideally wants to be just a fraction bigger than the bore size. Wouldn't 56mm exactly be OK?
all you have to do is make the head gasket exactly the same diameter as the bore, not the same as the psiton as the piston rocks at the dead centers like I already told you .

That's why I said "don't do half work". If you're going to take away 0.3 al arround, why stop there and not take away that last 0.05mm ? it would makes no sense at all !
My ultimate goal is to die young as late as possible !

stevo135+
Light Smoker
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by stevo135+ » Wed Nov 06, 2019 8:48 pm

I see what you mean now. Yes I'll make sure that I open the gasket ID to 56mm and then as you said I should be OK.

Just out of interest what is the highest effective compression ratio that people have run on the KR1'S and how did it affect the power curve?

I still keep seeing 125cc Motocross bikes with compression ratios in the 8-9:1 range, and assuming they run on super unleaded, there must be something in the way that they are designed or set up that allows such high compression ratios to be reliable?

stevo135+
Light Smoker
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by stevo135+ » Wed Feb 05, 2020 1:14 am

Evening all.
I just thought I'd finally post an update on my KMX's top end re-build, after not having much time to work on the bike for a few months.

I sent BDK racing a new head gasket and they kindly machined it out exactly to 56.5mm which should give me a safe working clearance for my 55.94mm bore.

I removed the head and took a few measurements. Firstly I set the piston to TDC and checked the deck height. I'm not sure what is technically measured as deck height, as the dome of the piston does come above the deck height of the cylinder. But at the edge of the piston it's lower than the deck height by 0.3mm as accurately as I could measure with a straight edge and feeler gauges, which probably isn't the ideal method but it gave me an indication of the clearance available.

Then I measured the step in the head from the squish band to the head face using the same method, so again not ideal. But I found that a 0.6mm feeler gauge was a tight fit under my straight edge. So this gives me about 0.9mm piston to head clearance + 0.25mm for a compressed head gasket. This though approximate is a bit more than I thought, but it's a safe clearance and I've already had 0.25mm skimmed off the head. I wish I'd been able to accurately measure the head volume and work out the compression ratio, but I forgot to order a burette in time, and the domed piston makes it a bit difficult to accurately measure the combustion chamber volume?

Anyway I've re-assembled the head with my modified gasket, but I did have an issue that has bugged me too. The cylinder was bead blasted before it was re-plated and although the deck looked to be flat in each direction as measured by visual indication with a straight edge, it's a slightly textured surface compared to my skimmed head face. I wasn't 100% confident that the head gasket would seal against the less smooth cylinder face, so I smeared a very light coat of threebond gasket sealant onto the head gasket, which is something I don't like doing as coated head gaskets are supposed to be dry fit and not need any sealant. I have always had success with installing head gaskets dry in the past, so my advice to anyone is don't let anyone bead blast your cylinder if you don't want it ruined. I suppose I could have lapped it on some fine wet&dry glass paper, but it's not the ideal outcome after having a cylinder re-plated by a specialist.

I've torqued the head down now to the quoted 19ib/ft and left it to for the sealant to cure. I'm hoping that it will be OK now and I'll have no clearance issues or coolant leaks. I still don't like the way the head fits without any location dowels, but there's room in my opinion for small dowels to be machined and fitted in the future on this engine. The other idea I had is maybe to have some blind bushes machined for the KIPS valve posts that go into the head, and then use the outer surface of the bushes as locating dowels in bored out holes in the head. I suppose to do this accurately without any binding you'd have to locate the bushes in the cylinder block too, so it'd be more complicated than adding dowels else where.

Anyway I'm just bolting the rest of the bits back on and I'll let you know what happens after I give the bike it's first run.

Can I ask for your advice on preferred running in methods for a forged piston in a Nikasil bore? I was going to run it under no load until it gets warm enough to open the thermostat assuming I have no leaks, and then let it fully cool down and re-check the head fastener torque figures.

I read alot about heat cycles, but I don't really get what they do for the running in process? Am I not better off on the second engine start to warm the engine up and then ride the bike round the block a few laps to put it straight under load, but keeping it away from full throttle or high rpm, until I've repeated this process several times.

Should I use mineral two stroke oil for the running in process as I was planning on using Silkolene Pro2 which is what I've coated the piston and bore with during the re-build?

Thanks Steve.

stevo135+
Light Smoker
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by stevo135+ » Wed Feb 05, 2020 1:28 am

Image

Picture above showing piston at TDC.

Image
Cylinder head.

Image
Measuring step in head to squish band with 0.6mm feeler gauge.
Sorry about the poor phone picture quality, but I thought they might show an idea of how it looks.

User avatar
JanBros
Avgas Sniffer
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: the land of Francorchamps
Contact:

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by JanBros » Fri Feb 07, 2020 12:59 am

looking at your last pic, to me the diameter of the head is +/-54mm : 2 inch (from 4 to 6) + 3/8th of an inch after the 6 minus 2/8 after the 4 . but you say the head is 55.3. still, let's suppoese you measured right.

than you still continue to mis-calculate your squish clearance : you can not count the 0.6mm from the head as it's diameter is smaller than the diameter of your piston !!!!

on the edge of the piston, you don't have squish-clearance, you only have head-clearance as the squish in your head does not reach the edge of the bore.

so you only have 0.25 and 0.3mm = 0.55 head-clearance which means you are in GP-engine-territory. when all parts are new it will not be a problem. But GP engines are not supposed to run 10.000km as they are opened probably daily and have service interval's of about a tenth for the crank. I don't think you'll get to 5000km before the piston start's kissing the head.

If I where you, I didn't start the engine, but take it appart again , and either add a 0.2mm gaskett under the cylinder, or better : have the head cut so the combustionchamber matches the bore.
My ultimate goal is to die young as late as possible !

stevo135+
Light Smoker
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by stevo135+ » Sat Feb 08, 2020 1:08 am

Hi JanBros.

Thanks for your comments on my engine re-build. What you are saying now makes sense, and is another oversight on my part. I can't be 100% about the diameter of the cylinder head combustion chamber or indeed its concentricity to the bore without removing it and measuring again.

It's frustrating as now I expect I've used up a modified head gasket ( I should have have 3-4 gaskets modified I guess) and I've got the scrape off all the sealant.

I see your point about the clearance issue on the outer edge of the piston, and how it can't work as it is. I'm torn though now between the two options in how I could fix it to make the engine reliable.

1, if I remove the cylinder with the head still torqued down I suppose I could get a thicker base gasket made for it. The current base gasket is a metal one that's 0.48mm thick. I expect a 0.7mm base gasket would be enough to give me a safe increase in piston clearance to the head. I'm assuming that this slight increase in cylinder height won't adversely affect the port timing as I don't want to reduce the performance or make the engine specs too unsuitable for my exhaust which is a fixed parameter.

2, The better but more involved option would be to remove the head and get it modified to the new bore size. This would depend on how central the combustion chamber is in the head. If its miles out then it wouldn't be worth bothering, or do I look for a used head with hopefully a more centralised combustion chamber?

If I do have the head modified then it's something my local car engine machine shop could do, as I'd assume they just need to machine outwards by around 2mm while following the angle of the squish band.

I'd need to get rid of all the sealant and get BDK to modify another head gasket for me, and probably a spare too for the next re-build. But really I should remove the cylinder too now as get it on a flat surface with some wet/dry paper and lap the top of the cylinder face perfectly smooth and flat, as its not as smooth as I'd like it currently.

Thanks for letting me know the issue and how to go about resolving it. Do you have any preference for how I should run in my set up once I've fixed the issue with the head/cylinder and piston clearance. I've heard some people say that I should be using cheap mineral two stroke oil for the first few runs to help the piston and rings bed in to the bore. I also don't know if heat cycles are desirable or not? To my mind I don't see how they help run in an engine compared to putting it under load and lots of on-off acceleration and braking?

Hopefully I'll be able to do a final engine build this time and then it'll be good for my 5000km service interval goal.

User avatar
JanBros
Avgas Sniffer
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: the land of Francorchamps
Contact:

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by JanBros » Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:55 am

do it properly and have the head re-cut.

when you raise the cylinder, you won't have any squish-action : only very limited between the head and piston, your actual squishgap between combustion chamber and piston will become to big for good squishing.
My ultimate goal is to die young as late as possible !

stevo135+
Light Smoker
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: KMX 125 engine re-build.

Post by stevo135+ » Sun Mar 01, 2020 12:35 am

OK, so I got two gaskets modified now so I have a spare for when it blows up or I get nervous after say 2000miles and decide to strip and inspect it all. I did remove the head and the combustion chamber dome is between 55.19 and 55.3mm in diameter. I've put a tiny chamfer on the step in the head with a needle file run around the circumference of the head, which makes it almost 56mm anyway.

I reassembled the head yesterday and after the sealant had dried, I decided to do a compression test today before I fit the exhaust and radiator. With an open throttle, after 6-7kicks I was getting 195psi. I did it again to check for repeatability and it was about the same 194-195psi.

It's supposed to a maximum of 178psi or 7.8:1 corrected, so I know it's pretty high in relation to the book figure. My plan now is to run it on 40:1 with Shell V-power and 3% octane booster added, which should give me at least 100RON I hope? I'm going to suck it and see, but I think this fuel blend will maybe be enough to keep it safe from detonation or that's my hope anyway.

My compression test apart from being on a cold engine, might be skewed by all the oil I used on the piston and bore, and I put 3-4drops down each side of the crank and on the big end bearing too, so there's probably a bit of oil taking up space in the crank case?

Post Reply